botorch provides a helper function gen_loo_cv_folds
to easily perform leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation (CV) by taking advantage of batch-mode regression and evaluation in GPyTorch. This tutorial illustrates the process on a noisy sinusoidal function, similar to the example from the batch-mode GP regression tutorial from GPyTorch:
$$y = \sin(2\pi x) + \epsilon, ~\epsilon \sim \mathcal N(0, 0.2).$$
Note: this tutorial aims to introduce batch-mode regression and evaluation in GPyTorch with CV as an example application. For alternative, more user-friendly functions to perform CV in Ax, see ax.modelbridge.cross_validation. However, for larger CV tasks, it may be useful to exploit GPyTorch batch-mode, as shown in this tutorial.
import torch
import math
device = torch.device("cpu")
dtype = torch.float64
torch.manual_seed(3);
For our training data, we take 20 regularly spaced points on the interval $[0, 1]$ and generate noisy evaluations with an observed noise variance of 0.2. Remember that botorch requires an explicit output dimension.
sigma = math.sqrt(0.2)
train_X = torch.linspace(0, 1, 20, dtype=dtype, device=device).view(-1, 1)
train_Y_noiseless = torch.sin(train_X * (2 * math.pi))
train_Y = train_Y_noiseless + sigma * torch.randn_like(train_Y_noiseless)
train_Yvar = torch.full_like(train_Y, 0.2)
The botorch function gen_loo_cv_folds
takes our observed data train_X
, train_Y
, train_Yvar
as input and returns the LOO CV folds in a CVFolds
object.
from botorch.cross_validation import gen_loo_cv_folds
cv_folds = gen_loo_cv_folds(train_X=train_X, train_Y=train_Y, train_Yvar=train_Yvar)
[KeOps] Warning : omp.h header is not in the path, disabling OpenMP. To fix this, you can set the environment variable OMP_PATH to the location of the header before importing keopscore or pykeops, e.g. using os.environ: import os; os.environ['OMP_PATH'] = '/path/to/omp/header' [KeOps] Warning : Cuda libraries were not detected on the system or could not be loaded ; using cpu only mode
The cv_folds
object contains the data, stored as tensors of appropriate batch shape, necessary to perform 20 CVs of 19 training points and 1 test point. For example, we can check that the shapes of the training inputs and training targets are b x n x d = 20 x 19 x 1
and b x n x o = 20 x 19 x 1
respectively, where o
is the number of outputs.
cv_folds.train_X.shape, cv_folds.train_Y.shape
(torch.Size([20, 19, 1]), torch.Size([20, 19, 1]))
cv_folds.test_X.shape, cv_folds.test_Y.shape
(torch.Size([20, 1, 1]), torch.Size([20, 1, 1]))
Note that in a situation where the dataset is large, one may not want to perform LOO; in that case, a similar process can be used to perform $k$-fold CV.
We can use the batch_cross_validation
function to perform LOOCV using batching (meaning that the b = 20
sets of training data can be fit as b = 20
separate GP models with separate hyperparameters in parallel through GPyTorch) and return a CVResult tuple with the batched GPyTorchPosterior
object over the LOOCV test points and the observed targets. The batch_cross_validation
requires a model class (model_cls
) and a marginal log likelihood class (mll_cls
). We will use the SingleTaskGP as the model_cls
and an ExactMarginalLogLikelihood as the mll_cls
.
from botorch.cross_validation import batch_cross_validation
from botorch.models import SingleTaskGP
from botorch.models.transforms.input import Normalize
from botorch.models.transforms.outcome import Standardize
from gpytorch.mlls.exact_marginal_log_likelihood import ExactMarginalLogLikelihood
input_transform = Normalize(d=train_X.shape[-1])
outcome_transform = Standardize(
m=train_Y.shape[-1],
batch_shape=cv_folds.train_Y.shape[:-2],
)
# instantiate and fit model
cv_results = batch_cross_validation(
model_cls=SingleTaskGP,
mll_cls=ExactMarginalLogLikelihood,
cv_folds=cv_folds,
model_init_kwargs={
"input_transform": input_transform,
"outcome_transform": outcome_transform,
},
)
To compute the cross-validation error, we first evaluate the test points by computing the posterior in batch mode. Next, we compute the squared errors for each test point from the prediction and take an average across all cross-validation folds.
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
%matplotlib inline
posterior = cv_results.posterior
mean = posterior.mean
cv_error = ((cv_folds.test_Y.squeeze() - mean.squeeze()) ** 2).mean()
print(f"Cross-validation error: {cv_error : 4.2}")
# get lower and upper confidence bounds
lower, upper = posterior.mvn.confidence_region()
# scatterplot of predicted versus test
_, axes = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(6, 4))
plt.plot([-1.5, 1.5], [-1.5, 1.5], "k", label="true objective", linewidth=2)
axes.set_xlabel("Actual")
axes.set_ylabel("Predicted")
axes.errorbar(
x=cv_folds.test_Y.numpy().flatten(),
y=mean.numpy().flatten(),
xerr=1.96 * sigma,
yerr=((upper - lower) / 2).numpy().flatten(),
fmt="*",
);
Cross-validation error: 0.11
Finally, we can visualize the fitted models. To do this, we again take advantage of batch-mode evaluation to obtain predictions, including lower and upper confidence regions, from each of the 20 models.
model = cv_results.model
with torch.no_grad():
# evaluate the models at a series of points for plotting
plot_x = (
torch.linspace(0, 1, 101).view(1, -1, 1).repeat(cv_folds.train_X.shape[0], 1, 1)
)
posterior = model.posterior(plot_x)
mean = posterior.mean
# get lower and upper confidence bounds
lower, upper = posterior.mvn.confidence_region()
plot_x.squeeze_()
The code snippet below plots the result for the 12th CV fold (by setting num = 12
), but note that we have computed the results for all folds above (other plots can be obtained by iterating num
from 1 to 20).
_, axes = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(6, 4))
# plot the 12th CV fold
num = 12
# plot the training data in black
axes.plot(
cv_folds.train_X[num - 1].detach().numpy(),
cv_folds.train_Y[num - 1].detach().numpy(),
"k*",
)
# plot the test data in red
axes.plot(
cv_folds.test_X[num - 1].detach().numpy(),
cv_folds.test_Y[num - 1].detach().numpy(),
"r*",
)
# plot posterior means as blue line
axes.plot(plot_x[num - 1].numpy(), mean[num - 1].numpy(), "b")
# shade between the lower and upper confidence bounds
axes.fill_between(
plot_x[num - 1].numpy(), lower[num - 1].numpy(), upper[num - 1].numpy(), alpha=0.5
);